To derive a derivative formula for the logarithmic functions, we make use once again of the fact that they are, by definition, the inverses of exponential functions. Surely there is a relationship between the derivative of an invertible function \(f\) and its inverse \(f^{-1}\text{,}\) right? Of course! And the relationship is revealed by the chain rule.
Amazing! We have just derived a formula for \(f^{-1}\) using nothing but the chain rule and the defining property of being an inverse. If you look closely, however, you will see there are two hidden assumptions in our argument. For one thing, for the last line of our derivation to make sense, we need \(f'(f^{-1}(x))\ne 0\text{.}\) This is not too difficult to deal with: we simply assume that \(f'\) is nonzero on its domain in order to apply the formula. The deeper issue at play is that in order to use th chain rule in the first place, we must assume \(f^{-1}\) is differentiable! It turns out that this condition is automatic as long as \(f\) is differentiable and \(f'\) is nonzero, though the proof of this fact is quite subtle, and will not be given here. We will, however, acknowledge this fact as its own important result in our theorem below.
We will very soon use TheoremΒ 2.13.1 to derive a formula for the derivative of logarithmic functions. However, the inverse derivative formula is very useful in its own right, and indeed, we will come back to it when discussing inverse trigonometric functions. Accordingly, we provide a procedure for applying the inverse derivative formula in general. Since the roles of input and output are somewhat fluid when going back and forth between a function \(f\) and its inverse \(f^{-1}\text{,}\) we will use the βinput/output neutralβ variable names \(r\) and \(s\text{.}\)
Let \(f\) be invertible and differentiable on its domain \(I\text{,}\) and assume \(f'\) is nonzero on \(I\text{.}\) To compute \(f^{-1}(r)\) for some \(r\) in the domain of \(f^{-1}\text{,}\) proceed as follows.
Compute \(f^{-1}(r)=s\text{.}\) In the absence of a formula for \(f^{-1}\text{,}\) this is often done by by finding the unique \(s\) such that \(f(s)=r\) and using the inverse function identity \(f^{-1}(r)=s\) if and only if \(f(s)=r\text{.}\)
Since \(f'(x)=5x^4+3x^2+3\) is clearly positive for all \(x\in \R\text{,}\) we see that \(f\) is increasing on its domain, and hence is one-to-one. Thus \(f\) has an inverse function.
Short of actually plotting points, we can at least produce a table of values for \(f^{-1}\) using a table of values of \(f\text{,}\) using (4) of TheoremΒ 2.10.25.
By plotting such points, and others with the help of technology, we are able to produce a detailed graph of \(f^{-1}\) even in the absence of an explicit formula. See FigureΒ 2.13.4.
Finally, to compute \((f^{-1})'(-5)\) and \((f^{-1})'(-10)\text{,}\) it remains only to compute \(f^{-1}(-5)\) and \(f^{-1}(-10)\) and plug these into the last expression above. We see using our table of values in (b) that \(f^{-1}(-5)=0\) and \(f^{-1}(-10)=-1\text{.}\) Thus
SubsectionDerivative formula for logarithmic functions
With the general inverse derivative formula in hand, it is no bother at all to produce derivative formulas for logarithmic functions. We will use this most often for the natural logarithm \(\ln\text{.}\) Setting \(f(x)=e^x\) and \(f^{-1}(x)=\ln x\text{,}\)(2.45) becomes
\begin{align*}
\frac{d}{dx} \ln x \amp =\frac{1}{f'(\ln x)}\text{.}
\end{align*}
Since \(f(x)=e^x\text{,}\) we have \(f'(x)=e^x\text{,}\) and thus
This is a somewhat surprising result. Whereas the natural logarithm is quite a complicated function (in fact, a transcendental one), its derivative \(1/x\) is a rational function! Interpreting the derivative as the slope of the tangent line, the fact that \(f'(x)=1/x\) for \(f(x)=\ln x\) is a precise quantitative description of the fact that the slop of the graph of \(f(x)=\ln x\) decreases as \(x\) increases. Indeed, since \(1/x\to 0\) as \(x\to \infty\text{,}\) we can say in fact that the slope of \(\ln x\) approaches zero as \(x\to \infty\text{.}\)
In making official our derivative formula for \(\ln x\text{,}\) we will generalize it slightly to the function \(g(x)=\ln \abs{x}\text{.}\) Note the difference: whereas the domain of \(\ln x\) is \((0,\infty)\text{,}\) the domain of \(g(x)=\ln \abs{x}\) is \(\R-\{0\}\text{.}\)
for all \(x\ne 0\text{.}\) To see why, note that if \(x> 0\text{,}\) then \(\ln\abs{x}=\ln x\text{,}\) and our formula above applie. And if \(x< 0\text{,}\) we have \(\abs{x}=-x\text{,}\) in which case an application of the chain rule tells us that
The expression at the end is surprisingly simple, until you realize that we could have just as well used some logarithmic properties to avoid the chain rule altogether:
We could produce a derivative formula for general logarithmic functions \(\log_b\) proceeding exactly as above, by identifying \(\log_b\) as the inverse function of \(f(x)=b^x\text{.}\) Instead, we put our change of base formula to work to come up with a quicker derivation. Given any \(b> 0\text{,}\) we have
For each of the given functions \(f(x)\text{,}\) find the derivative \(\left(f^{-1}\right)'(c)\) at the given point \(c\text{,}\) first finding \(a=f^{-1}(c)\text{.}\)