Skip to main content

Math 344-1,2: Kursobjekt

Section 2.11 Jordan curve theorem

Proof.

This proof is adapted from an argument given by Ryuji Maehara in the article The Jordan curve theorem via the Brouwer fixed point theorem 1 .
Assume by contradiction that \(\R^2-C\) is not connected. This means that among the connected components of \(\R^2-C\text{,}\) in addition to the unbounded connected component \(U_\infty\text{,}\) there is a bounded component \(U\text{.}\)
Now observe that we have \(\partial U=\overline{U}-U\subseteq C\text{.}\) This is because we have \(\overline{U}\cap U'=\emptyset\) for any connected component \(U'\ne U\text{,}\) since \(U'\) is open and disjoint from \(U\text{.}\)
Since \(C\) is bounded, we can pick an element \(\boldu\in U\) and \(R> 0\) such that \(C\subseteq B_R(\boldu)\text{.}\) Since \(\R^2-B_R(\boldu)\) is unbounded and connected, we must have \(\R^2-B_R(\boldu)\subseteq U_\infty\) and hence \(U\subseteq B_R(\boldu)\text{.}\) Let \(B=\overline{B}_R(\boldu)\) (homeomorphic to \(B^2\)) and let \(S=\partial B\) (homeomorphic to \(S^1\)). Observe that \(S\subseteq U_\infty\text{.}\)
Since \(C\) is a closed subset of the normal space \(B\text{,}\) the Tietze extension theorem implies that the identity function \(\id\colon C\rightarrow C\) extends to retraction \(r\colon B\rightarrow C\text{.}\) Define \(f\colon B\rightarrow B-\{\boldu\}\) as follows:
\begin{equation*} f(\boldx)=\begin{cases} r(\boldx) \amp \text{if } \boldx\in \overline{U} \\ \boldx \amp \text{if } \boldx\in B-U. \end{cases} \end{equation*}
Since \(\overline{U}\cap U^c=\partial U\subseteq C\text{,}\) and since \(r\vert_C=\id\text{,}\) the function \(f\) is well-defined and continuous by the closed pasting lemma. We cannot have \(f(\boldx)=\boldu\) since \(\boldr(\boldx)\in C\) for all \(\boldx\in \overline{U}\) and \(f(\boldx)=\boldx\) for all \(\boldx\notin U\text{.}\)
Finally, consider the map \(a\circ p\circ f\colon B\rightarrow S\subseteq B\text{,}\) where \(p\colon B-\{\boldu\}\rightarrow S\) is the usual retraction map of the ball onto the circle, and \(a\colon S\rightarrow S\) is the antipodal map on \(S\text{.}\)
Map without fixed point
This map has no fixed point, contradicting Brouwer’s fixed point theorem. Indeed, since \(a\circ p\circ f(B)\subseteq S\text{,}\) any candidate for a fixed point would have to be an element of \(S\text{;}\) but for any \(\boldx\in S\text{,}\) we have
\begin{align*} a(p(f(\boldx)))\amp =a(p(\boldx)) \amp (f\vert_S=\id) \\ \amp =a(\boldx) \amp (p\vert_S=\id)\\ \amp \ne \boldx\text{,} \end{align*}
since \(a(\boldx)\) is the antipode of \(\boldx\text{.}\)
Since we have reached a contradiction, we conclude that \(\R^2-C\) must be connected.

Proof.