Section 2.8 Divergence theorem
Definition 2.8.1.
A piecewise smooth surface
Theorem 2.8.2. Divergence (or Gauss's) theorem.
Let
Example 2.8.3. Flux out of cube.
Let
Let
Corollary 2.8.4. Zero divergence implies zero flux.
Assume the solid region
Proof.
An easy consequence of the divergence theorem:
Corollary 2.8.5. Identical flux.
Suppose the solid region
where for both surface integrals
Proof.
Let
We conclude that
as desired.
Theorem 2.8.6. .
If the component functions of
for all
Proof.
We have
where in the last step we have used Clairaut's theorem to identify the various “mixed partials”: i.e.,
Remark 2.8.7. Gradient, curl, divergence sequence.
Let
Applying two operators in sequence results in a zero function (
and ). In other words the image of any one of these operators lies within the set of a functions mapping to zero when applying the next operator.If
is simply connected, then any vector field that is mapped to by is in the image ofIf
is contractible (too technical to define here), then any vector field that is mapped to by is in the image of
Corollary 2.8.8. Curl field has zero flux.
Assume the solid region
Proof.
This is an easy consequence of Theorem 2.8.6 and Corollary 2.8.4 since
Example 2.8.9. Gauss's law.
Given a a point charge
where
Gauss's law can be generalized to a situation where the surface
where
First observe that
for all
Next, assume
where
which one can show directly using the definition of the surface integral and the standard parametrization of
Finally, using the usual parametrization
which satisfies
we have
as desired!
Theorem 2.8.10. Divergence interpretation.
Assume the component functions of
Thus we interpret
Proof.
For all
Next a generalization of the integral average value theorem to triple integrals imlies
for some point